I am in the hunt for an LS powered 968... Anyone out there have or know of one that needs a new home?
Thanks!
LS powered 968
#1
Posted 12 April 2017 - 05:21 PM
#2
Posted 12 April 2017 - 07:15 PM
they do pop up for sale. so far, with one exception (and i think it's only a matter of time) all of the ones i have seen built, have been sold or wrecked.
i know of a few that have been wrecked, and one guy who pulled the motor out and put back in the supercharged 968 engine, because the V8 powered 968 was a crappy car to drive. horrible idea. better to just buy a vette
but to each his own
#3
Posted 12 April 2017 - 09:10 PM
#4
Posted 13 April 2017 - 07:53 AM
Well guys... You'll be happy to hear that I am actually picking up a supercharged 968, hopefully this weekend. More to come!
#5
Posted 13 April 2017 - 08:14 AM
well, hopefully it's not an sfr kit or 928MS raptor kit. neither one of those run that well. they just weren't finished, and the tuning left a lot to be desired. there are quite a few bad reviews on them, and i don't think they are selling them anymore as a result.
there is a really nice black cab with a good kit on it for sale here on this site. we know the car, and trust it well
http://www.968forums...-968-cabriolet/
#6
Posted 16 April 2017 - 09:49 AM
What/where are the issues with the later 928MS kits?
#7
Posted 16 April 2017 - 10:43 AM
the stage 1 kit doesn't run well. they only use a rising rate pressure regulator to address fuel needs. they do no programming whatsoever. that does not adequately deal with the fuel needs. also, it does not address the part throttle/on boost lean condition at all. further, they drive the belt on the smooth side, which causes belt burnout. they change out the dual speed dual fans for a single electric fan. that does not provide as good of a cooling system as stock. every one of these kits that i have heard about has had issues with this. even the guy who had a magazine article written about his car has since gotten rid of the kit. a guy in australia fought for over a year, and spent over $10 trying to get the 928MS kit working right. ultimately he yanked it off and bought one of mine. he has since bought another one of mine.
the stage 2 kit had to use a standalone computer. i cannot speak to how well that setup runs, but i can bet that they did not create the "silver bullet" map that i did, which addresses the part throttle/on boost issues. also, they use the 3rd generation injectors, which i tested and proved to have issues, due to the size of our pistons and shape of the combustion chamber, which is why i went back to the 1st generation injector design, and had larger ones made for my kit.
in developing my kit, i had to adjust 20 of the 142 maps in the computer. anything less caused less than desirable running conditions. the 928 kit is incomplete. that's why i didn't buy one, and developed my own. i wanted to, and begged him to complete the kit properly. i had my big fat checkbook revved up and ready. he refused. i had no desire to design one, but because he refused to do the job right, i had no choice. in the end, i am glad i did, and am proud of the fact that it is so complete that it is 50 states smog legal.
seriously, on top of the fact that the kit on there is problematic, the car you are looking at has an awful lot of miles on it, and is not well optioned. the car i linked to is a LOT better, has half the miles of the other one, and actually runs right.
you've heard the old adage "pay me now or pay me later"?
there is a LOT of information here about these kits. do yourself a favor and read up before spending any money. you won't regret it. also, you can ask the 60 some odd people here who have my kit about how well it runs. you will be hard pressed to find anybody with the 92MS kit. i know there are a handful of them out there, but as far as i know, there is only 1 of them running, and it was the test mule car.
#8
Posted 16 April 2017 - 11:11 AM
by the way, i have no motivation here either. i have stopped making my kits, and have shut down all operations in preparation for my move to ireland
#9
Posted 16 April 2017 - 05:06 PM
I have #60 and the change in the car is amazing!
#10
Posted 16 April 2017 - 05:23 PM
Like flash said, a moot point now because the D1R kits are no longer available , but this has such a smooth and linear performance that I can't imagine anything out there you could do to a 968 ( short of a factory turbo ) that would be any better, all around .
Edited by ds968, 17 April 2017 - 01:41 AM.
#11
Posted 17 April 2017 - 05:25 PM
In case you need more horsepower than the D1R SC.
http://www.automobil...ws-in-new-york/
Edited by az968, 17 April 2017 - 05:28 PM.
#12
Posted 17 April 2017 - 05:31 PM
#13
Posted 17 April 2017 - 06:29 PM
Sure, just need some minor sheet metal mods, oh, and some minor electrical, oh, and some minor suspension mods, oh, and some minor transmission tweaks, oh, and some minor rear gearing changes, oh, and some wider tires. But, all in all, pretty straight forward. And better than an LS engine. Maybe need stronger motor mounts too.
I think Flash was working on kit that a while back, he may still have the spare parts.
Edited by az968, 17 April 2017 - 06:36 PM.
#14
Posted 17 April 2017 - 07:44 PM
lol - it never ceases to amaze me at how many people think you can just stuff a big motor into any car. i've done my fair share of such silly projects. fun for a minute, but they never drove like they did with the factory engine. the reality is that car companies spend a LOT of money designing their cars, and doubling power is never easy. it always results in bringing to light the shortcomings of the car. the 968 is not built to manage the amount of torque that a V8 produces. the chassis will need to be reinforced. it is not geared anywhere near civilized for a V8. a new transaxle will be needed. then there is the electrical nightmare. many things in the 968 run through the ECU. you can't eliminate it. those things will need to be adapted to work with the standalone for the engine. then we get to the suspension and brakes. more power means more suspension load and more speed, requiring more brakes. the list is endless.
the bottom line is that, while it can be done, it's going to be very expensive. you can plan on at least $50k to do it right. in the end though, what do you have? a hatchback with a chevy V8. sounds like a vette to me. even if you chose the convertible version, you would still be better off with a vette, if only because the power top actually works.
keep in mind that i HATE vettes, but i'd take one of those any day over a 968 with a chevy V8 in it. it's just a bad match.
#15
Posted 18 April 2017 - 12:53 AM
Edited by ds968, 18 April 2017 - 01:06 AM.
#16
Posted 18 April 2017 - 05:03 AM
roflmao
#17
Posted 18 April 2017 - 05:05 AM
Wouldn't it be easier to drop a 968 (styled) body onto a Corvette frame? Still, I see no good reason to do it...
JMHO,
Jay
#18
Posted 18 April 2017 - 05:43 AM
#19
Posted 18 April 2017 - 05:59 AM
i did say "to do it right".
this would mean a new engine, not some used piece of junk - $10k
it would mean a transaxle built for the job - $10k
chassis reinforcement - $2k
brakes - $3k
suspension - $3k
tires/wheels - $5k (that's a very conservative number too
electronics work - $1-$2k
standalone ignition - $2k
tuning for standalone - $3k
i've got $39-$40k right there. please note i did not include the kit for installation, nor ANY labor costs (except tuning and electronics work)
also, time is money, so "doing it yourself" is not free. any time spent building the car has to factor in the cost of the time away from work, or vacation or whatever else. then, there is the "shiny stuff" you have to buy the wife for even starting on a project like this
#20
Posted 18 April 2017 - 06:11 AM
Anyway, I do remember he said the electrical / electronics work was a colossal PITA in terms of time spent to get it to work right, synch with the computer , etc. and that's what he was still tweaking years later ...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users